![]() HCL identifies the airframe as OH-LKK, originally delivered to Finnair in 2007.Īs a result of the accident the ground-handling agent implemented preventative actions to ensure standardisation of docking procedures during airbridge reconnection. This structural damage prevented the jet from being pressurised. The angle between the platform and the Embraer did not trigger proximity sensors on the airbridge, and its left corner contacted the fuselage, puncturing the skin below the forward door. “During the reconnection docking sequence, the angle between the platform and the aircraft was different from the angle at the initial arrival.” “While manoeuvring the, the bridge operator felt sun-blinded,” says HCL. The airbridge operator performed this task manually. To enable the cockpit crew to inspect the nose-gear, the airbridge had to be re-attached. Airline Business special: CEOs to watch in 2021Ĭameras captured differing airbridge deflection during arrival (left) and re-attachment (right)īut Danish investigation authority HCL says that, while a towbarless tractor was manoeuvring to engage with the jet, it inadvertently contacted the aircraft’s nose-gear.FlightGlobal Guide to Business Aviation Training and Safety 2021.EDGE: A new global force in aerospace and defence.Shell Aviation: What will it take to Decarbonise Aviation?.What does the future of aviation look like in 2022?.Guide to Business Aviation Training and Safety 2022. • What will it take to Decarbonise Aviation? Our innovative air bridge strategy aims to improve connectivity between. Guide to Business Aviation Training and Safety 2023.Airline Business Covid-19 recovery tracker.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |